Talk:IQue Player
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
well. if it should either probably merged but if it has any differences from the japanese or american version of SSB it needs to stay. Kperfekt722 (talk) 01:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
Weak Delete I don't really see a point to this page, but what do you guys think? FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 03:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Well we do have pages for each of the platforms that play smash bros. I don't see this page adding anything significant to the wiki, but it does fall under an area that we allow. I'm really not bothered either way about this article. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Weak Keep, Clarinet Hawks Point Only Moreso Felt By Me. Kperfekt722 (talk) 04:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Keep or Merge It's far too relevant to go completely-- the N64 itself plays other N64 games too, does that mean the Nintendo 64 article has no point either? While it's true it may only be indirectly related to SSB , the same can also be said about all the articles in the "Consoles" category. In fact, most of those are even less related-- many only had games that featured characters that appear in SSB. At least the iQue Player actually plays Super Smash Bros. Not to mention, that since Nintendo GameCube was never released in China, and Wii won't be until later this year (at the very earliest, and even then who knows when or if even if Brawl will be released there?), the iQue Player is the only platform SSB appears on in the most populated nation in the world. Keeping that in mind, how can it be considered less than other articles like Game Boy or Wii? The very suggestion that it is irrelevant just seems absurd to me. Granted, it might not be an entirely bad idea to merge it with Nintendo 64 , since it's more or less the same platform, just in a special format for a different region. But if we go that route we should probably also merge Famicom Disk System with Nintendo Entertainment System as well.-- Bman87301 (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Keep or Merge, preferably Keep Same reasons as above. I'd prefer it to stay as its own article, but I won't put up a fight against a merge, either. WaluigiIsAwesome (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)